Reply: 2

Auto translated

Several controlling areas

While consulting our client, we encountered the following problem:
The customer group comprises approx. 300 company codes with legally independent units in Europe. Due to a series of divergent fiscal years, approx. 10 controlling areas have been set up in recent years.
In order to be able to develop condensed Profit Center Accounting (PC) down to segment level and strategic business units below, cross-company code PC must be formed and consolidated. Since some of the company codes are in different controlling areas, the question now arises as to how we can represent a PC hierarchy (across cost centers) in SAP. According to the EC-PCA documentation, this is not possible even with the latest release.
Alternatively, the customer would also be helped if it were possible to consolidate the existing controlling areas and solve the problem of the differing fiscal years in another way (e.g., using FI means instead of CO structures).

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Login now

2 Answers

  • joergsiebert
    joergsiebert
    For Profit Center Accounting, the controlling area is the upper limit. You cannot post across controlling areas.
    In BW, you can of course merge the many controlling areas and carry out comprehensive reporting. However, all allocation options such as assessment and distribution are missing.
  • User #42247
    User #42247
    Hello,
    The problem of segment accounting does not exclude the problem of legal consolidation. That is, even if I allocate across cost accounting areas, I leave the boundaries of the legal entity in any case, which requires the use of a clean further allocation (use of internal order billing, etc.). By assigning the same segment descriptions in different controlling areas (or their assigned PCA) the NewGL gets the segment info. This means that even if an allocation is made from one segment (10) to another company code, where a CO object with segment assignment (10) is also used, there is strictly speaking no segment change in FI. In fact, segment changes can occur even within a company code. The use of an additional dimension (e.g. GSBER) remains additionally unaffected. The resulting question is, whether it is not better to switch to SEM-BCS on the reporting tool side in order to consolidate the matrix.
    Small remark at this point:
    Segment changes are "small sales" between the segments possibly with profit markup ("perfectly" mapped ;-) ...). There is still a lot unresolved at SAP *g*. As a result, you usually always have to build something ... if necessary roll-up via Special-Ledger exclusively for the dimension Segment from NewGL and then BCS or EC-CS for consolidation etc. is on the spot. Multiple stages sound complicated, but can increase transparency. Otherwise, it quickly becomes unclear which partner is now filled with which segment (inherited or substituted from wherever) in which cases. In addition, a segment consolidation entails certain postings, which may then also have to flow back into the operative company codes/system (corrections, etc.).
    Good Luck
    Matthias Kroner